Canada should implement many of the reforms proposed by Chavez

venezuelan-flag.pngIf, like me, you live in the Western, capitalist world, you likely haven’t heard anything about the revolutionary referendum that just occurred in Venezuela except the lie that it’s going to make Chavez “President for Life” (see: Fox News, Daily Telegraph) or that the referendum was likely going to be won by the “no” side

In actuality, the amendment to Article 230 merely removes the two-term limit on the Venezuelan president and allows him/her to continue serving so long as the public continues voting for him or her in regularly scheduled (7 years apart) elections. So, by this logic, it’s anti-democratic to let people democratically vote for whomever they wish. Also, by this logic, Canada isn’t a democracy because our former Prime Minister Mackenzie King was first elected in 1921 and served (with only shortchavez-and-supporters.png interruptions) until 1948.

So, since I imagine few people have taken the time to cut past the corporate media and find out what was actually proposed and adopted by the people of Venezuela (new exit polls now put the victory of the referendum in question. Stay tuned for more developments), here is a list of some of what I consider to be the best of the 69 constitutional reforms proposed. Canada should seriously take a look at this and consider implementing some of these reforms here.

The bolded items, I believe, are the best of the best and thus should be a first priority for Canada to catch up to Venezuela.

Block A

Art. 18 – Provides a new right, the right to the city, which says that all citizens have the right to equal access to the city’s services or benefits. Also names Caracas, the capital as the “Cradle of Simon Bolivar, the Liberator, and Queen of the Warairarepano” [an indigenous name for the mountain range surrounding Caracas].

Art. 64 – Lowers the minimum voting age from 18 to 16 years.

Art. 67 – Requires candidates for elected office to be set up in accordance with gender parity, reverses the prohibition against state financing of campaigns and parties, and prohibits foreign funding of political activity.

Art. 70 – Establishes that councils of popular power (of communities, workers, students, farmers, fishers, youth, women, etc.) are one of the main means for citizen participation in the government.

Art. 87 – Creates a social security fund for the self-employed, in order to guarantee them a pension, vacation pay, sick pay, etc.

Art. 90 – Reduction of the workweek from 44 hours to 36.

Art. 98 – Guarantees freedom for cultural creations, but without guaranteeing intellectual property.

Art. 100 – Recognition of Venezuelans of African descent, as part of Venezuelan culture to protect and promote (in addition to indigenous and European culture).

Art. 103 – Right to a free education expanded from high school to university.

Art. 112 – The state will promote a diversified and independent economic model, in which the interests of the community prevail over individual interests and that guarantee the social and material needs of the people. The state is no longer obliged to promote private enterprise.

Art. 113 – Monopolies are prohibited instead of merely being “not allowed.” The state has the right to “reserve” the exploitation of natural resources or provision of services that are considered by the constitution or by a separate law to be strategic to the nation. Concessions granted to private parties must provide adequate benefits to the public.

Art. 115 – Introduces new forms of property, in addition to private property. The new forms are (1) public property, belonging to state bodies, (2) direct and indirect social property, belonging to the society in general, where indirect social property is administered by the state and direct is administered by particular communities, (3) collective property, which belongs to particular groups, (4) mixed property, which can be a combination of ownership of any of the previous five forms.

Art. 136 – Creates the popular power, in addition to the municipal, state, and national powers. “The people are the depositories of sovereignty and exercise it directly via the popular power. This is not born of suffrage nor any election, but out of the condition of the human groups that are organized as the base of the population.” The popular power is organized via communal councils, workers’ councils, student councils, farmer councils, crafts councils, fisher councils, sports councils, youth councils, elderly councils, women’s councils, disables persons’ councils, and others indicated by law.

Art. 152 – Venezuela’s foreign policy is directed towards creating a pluri-polar world, free of hegemonies of any imperialist, colonial, or neo-colonial power.

Art. 153 – Strengthening of the mandate to unify Latin America, so as to achieve what Simon Bolivar called, “A Nation of Republics.”

Art. 167 – States’ incomes are increased from 20% to 25% of the national budget, where 5% is to be dedicated to the financing of each state’s communal councils.

Art. 230 – Presidential term is extended from six to seven years. The two consecutive term limit on presidential reelection is removed.

Art. 272 – Removal of the requirement for the state to create an autonomous penitentiary system and places the entire system under the administration of a ministry instead of states and municipalities. Also, removes the option of privatizing the country’s penitentiary system.

Art. 299 – The socio-economic regimen of the country is based on socialist (among other) principles. Instead of stipulating that the state promotes development with the help of private initiative, it is to do so with community, social, and personal initiative.

Art. 303 – Removal of the permission to privatize subsidiaries of the country’s state oil industry that operate within the country.

Art. 307 – Strengthening of the prohibition against latifundios (large and idle landed estates) and creation of a tax on productive agricultural land that is idle. Landowners who engage in the ecological destruction of their land may be expropriated.

Art. 318 – Removal of the Central Bank’s autonomy and foreign reserves to be administrated by the Central Bank together with the President.

Art. 328 – Armed forces of Venezuela renamed to “Bolivarian Armed Force.” Specification that the military is “patriotic, popular, and anti-imperialist” at the service of the Venezuelan people and never at the service of an oligarchy or of a foreign imperial power, whose professionals are not activists in any political party (modified from the prohibition against all political activity by members of the military).

Block B

Art. 21 – Inclusion of prohibition against discrimination based on sexual orientation and on health.

Art. 82 – Protection of primary home from confiscation due to bankruptcy or other legal proceedings.

Art. 109 – Equal voting rights for professors, students, and employees in the election of university authorities.

(source here, or here)

May our Venezuelan comrade’s fidelity to the blood-stained banner of social justice continue to be an inspiration to us all in victory and defeat.

.

Correction: Since posting this, new exit polls have come in which put the victory of the referendum in question.

See Also:

Propaganda in Action: So, who’s going to win the election in Venezuela?

How to distort economic data 101

The difference between the NDP and the Communist Party…

Our entire existence summed up in one cartoon

Che Guevara: Cuban revolutionary or puppy-eating serial murderer?

Why capitalism can’t continue forever and why socialism will prevail

Peace is overrated

14 Responses to “Canada should implement many of the reforms proposed by Chavez”


  1. 1 Larry Gambone 2 December, 2007 at 10:13 pm

    That we had only half of those measures! Time to talk in terms of popular power for Canadians too. So disgusting how the CBC is treating the referendum They have sold out completely to the Yanqui…

  2. 3 Jake 3 December, 2007 at 12:14 am

    Um… state financing of political parties and campaigns. That would actually suck a huge amount for anyone on the left in Canada. The sponsorship scandal, for example, would be legal.

    Do you think the “state” would finance opposition parties not in government? Do you think this will happen in Chavez’ distopian new Venezuela. Harper would have a complete free hand to run his campaign with public money.

    As a longtime observer of and traveler in Latin America, I offer a quiet, pessimistic suggestion: this reform is going to prove disastrous, and the self-styled “Bolivarian” liberator is just a new kind of Caudillo.

  3. 4 paulitics 3 December, 2007 at 1:11 am

    Jake – Actually Canada DOES have public financing of political parties and campaigns and the government DOES (and is required by law to) fund all political parties that registered above 2% of the vote in the previous federal election (although there is a court case currently in appeals which seeks to abolish this threshold).

    So, your comment is moot. That’s something that Chavez has proposed that we’ve already implemented and it’s actually been seen as a very good thing for the left of centre NDP and Bloc Quebecois (as well as the Greens). Ironically enough, the party that implemented it in Canada, the Liberals, are the ones who have benefited the least from the reform.

    If you’d like to read more about this and how Canada is not, despite your concerns, a dictatorship (or on how the government doesn’t only fund the ruling party), you can see the official Parliament of Canada website’s outline of Bill C-24 here:

    http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/bills_ls.asp?Parl=37&Ses=2&ls=c24

  4. 5 Kuri 3 December, 2007 at 9:07 am

    I’m also fond of this one, in addition to your bolded ones:

    “Art. 64 – Lowers the minimum voting age from 18 to 16 years.”

  5. 6 paulitics 3 December, 2007 at 10:11 am

    I contemplated bolding that one too, but then I realized that, if given my way, I’d probably bold all of them.

    I’ve heard many scholarly and non-scholarly academic arguments for lowering the minimum voting age and all were very convincing. But the one argument that was the most convincing for me is all the ample evidence abound that shows that 18 years of age is quite possibly the worst age for people to start voting. It’s the time when a majority of people are leaving the home and then are either relocating to school or worrying about getting a good-paying full time career for the first time in their lives.

  6. 7 Kim 3 December, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    That is an interesting argument that you present, Paul. I never thought of it like that. So, if the voting age were lowered, then young people would be able to get into the habit of voting before the stress of leaving the home gets to them? Certainly an interesting point to consider.

  7. 8 saskboy 3 December, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    I think I’d favour lowering the voting age, at least to 17 so it covers most high school graduates.

    I do have a problem with extending any terms in office, especially past 5 years. Imagine what you’d think if Bush moved to have his limits removed. It’s just such an essential check to not let the public make the same mistake more than once. Already we have a country to the south of us that has a public electing just 2 families, possibly for well over 20 years.

  8. 9 doug newton 3 December, 2007 at 5:13 pm

    “So, if the voting age were lowered, then young people would be able to get into the habit of voting before the stress of leaving the home gets to them?”
    Voting is definitely a good habit to get into and an individual right to be treasured.
    However, it seems to me that anyone still living with and/or off their parents can’t have a complete appreciation of what constitutes good or bad public policy. Voting age was set based on social patterns that don’t necessarily apply any longer.
    I think we should raise the voting age given that dependence on parents or adolescence seems to have extended well into the 20’s with a new phase called emerging adulthood.

  9. 10 ken hanly 3 December, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    While there were many excellent reforms in the constitutional reform package as you point out, there were also some authoritarian features in the package that turned off many Chavez supporters. It would have been much better if he had left those out. If he had the package would no doubt have passed easily.
    At least now Chavez will have to ensure that there are new leaders to take over the Bolivarian revolution. That may be all to the good and it will avoid the cult of personality which can become a liability to the revolution.


  1. 1 Propaganda in Action: An unfair referendum in Venezuela? « Paulitics: Paul’s Socialist Investigations Trackback on 2 December, 2007 at 10:21 pm
  2. 2 Red Jenny Trackback on 3 December, 2007 at 11:19 am
  3. 3 binary options x Trackback on 11 May, 2015 at 3:24 am
  4. 4 binary trading strategies Trackback on 16 May, 2015 at 4:30 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Resources:

home page polling resource

Click below to download the

Paulitics Blog Search

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in the comments section beneath each post on this blog do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the blog's author and creator. Individual commentators on this blog accept full responsibility for any and all utterances.

Reddit

Progressive Bloggers

Blogging Canadians

Blogging Change

LeftNews.org

Paulitics Blog Stats

  • 836,724 hits since 20 November, 2006

%d bloggers like this: