Who do we care about?

If we listen to the Western mainstream media, the US and the UK and their allies are in Iraq due to their care and compassion for human suffering in Iraq.  In fact, this humanitarian argument is the specific argument Michael Ignatieff gave for why he supported the Iraq war during the Liberal leadership debates.

We’ll ignore the vast corpus of literature documenting how the US and the UK and the West didn’t care about Iraqi humanitarian conditions in the 1980s when the Iraqi government was a major recipient of US Foreign Aid and Military Aid.  We’ll also ignore the fact that after Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against the Iranians and  largely Kurdish villages in northern Iraq, the US responded by…… resupplying Hussein.

Giving George W. Bush the benefit of the doubt, let’s assume he felt that his former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and his father were wrong in their Iraq policy during the 1980s.  Therefore, let’s use only the Bush administration’s behaviour to determine whether they care about Iraqis. 

I think the single most damning evidence – damning because both a) its convincing and b) its irrefutable – is the treatment of US dead compared with the treatment of Iraqi dead.

Consider the following:

We know that as of Friday, November 24, 2006 at 10am EST, there were precisely 2,869 American soldiers killed in Iraq (and 2,303 of those were killed in combat) [source: U.S. Department of Defense].   Moreover, we know that there were precisely 9,977 soldiers who were wounded and not returned to duty (which is just slightly higher than the standard formula of ‘wounded = fatalities x 3’).   We even, therefore, know the precise wounded-to-fatality ratio of U.S. soldiers as well as the breakdown of fatalities by month.

While we can’t photograph these people, it is clear that the Americans, the British and the West, clearly care about them.

On the other side of the spectrum lay the Iraqis.

How many Iraqis have been killed?  Nothing has been published by the US.  No serious estimations have been given.  And no serious efforts to obtain estimates have been attempted.  The closest thing the Bush administration has come to quantifying the Iraqi dead is here:

Anecdotal evidence?  I’ll be the first to admit it.  That’s why I was so pleased to learn that a team of professional statisticians and medial practitioners had conducted the most thorough investigation of Iraqi war dead since the start of the war.   Finally, some hard solid evidence, using sound statistical measurement techniques, to quantify what the American government refuses to quantify.  What do you suppose the Bush administration’s reaction to this data was?

Well, take a look for yourself:

(Part 1)

(Part 2)

If you want a more detailed explanation of why this survey is legitimate, you can watch Les Roberts give a longer lecture on his methodology here:

So, do we really care about Iraqis?  If we don’t care enough to count them, can we say that we care enough to develop a system of government for them which actually benefits them rather than us

If we acknowledge that their entire system of government was designed primarily for our benefit rather than theirs, the next question inevitably becomes:  ought we to think that Iraqi ‘democracy’ as it exists now is even a good thing?  If it is not, and if Iraqis have no mechanism through which their voices can be heard, is it unreasonable to understand why they would resort to terrorism?  If it’s understandable, is it out of order to assume that you might resort to violence were you placed in a similar situation?


6 Responses to “Who do we care about?”

  1. 1 Big Guy in TB 26 November, 2006 at 4:35 pm

    Of course the US doesn’t care about Iraqis. The US’s only concern is to gather control of the oil reserves. They may try to paint an alternate picture, but it is nothing more than trying to say things that “will sound good but not have any real or true meaning”. Goodness knows, it is a sad day indeed when the US is trying to install “US style democracy”, given that they do not and cannot tell the truth on many things. Gee, a thought just came to me — I wonder if they used US made voting machines in the last Iraqi election???? (wink wink nod nod).

    In my view the US government cannot be trusted and will tell us what they think they want us to hear, and not the real facts. It is nothing more than manipulation of the masses at its best.

  2. 2 paulitics 26 November, 2006 at 6:14 pm

    The US didn’t have to use voting machines to rig the Iraqi election…. they did that through the Iraqi constitution. Any political party the US didn’t want running in the election was banned from running (that’s one reason why there are no Ba’athists in the Iraqi Parliament even though the Ba’ath party is extremely strong in some of Iraq’s neighbours like Syria (and to a lesser extent in Jordan).

    I’m no saying there should be a Ba’ath party in Iraq, but I’m just using it as the single largest example of the US wanting democracy… just not the kind that will generate results that are unfavourable to them.

  3. 3 Red Jenny 30 December, 2006 at 7:54 pm

    I guess the old adage “Actions speak louder than words” is applicable here. They can put any spin on it they want: WMDs, democracy promotion, women’s rights, blah blah blah… but the truth is they are killing killing killing. They don’t care about the Iraqis at all. Good post. I like your blog.

  1. 1 Reality Check: What you're not supposed to think about « Paulitics: Paul’s Socialist Investigations Trackback on 26 May, 2007 at 4:15 pm
  2. 2 Paulitics: Paul’s Socialist Investigations | Alternative News Sources Trackback on 27 May, 2007 at 8:44 pm
  3. 3 Who are the terrorists? « Alessio in Asia Trackback on 28 May, 2007 at 11:39 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


home page polling resource

Click below to download the

Paulitics Blog Search

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in the comments section beneath each post on this blog do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the blog's author and creator. Individual commentators on this blog accept full responsibility for any and all utterances.


Progressive Bloggers

Blogging Canadians

Blogging Change


Paulitics Blog Stats

  • 855,364 hits since 20 November, 2006

%d bloggers like this: